Labarchives not allowing me to download pdf of notebook

Appreciate your help, will reach out if I encounter any questions in the process. I would like to point out that Docollab is compatible with mobile devices. Furthermore, it provides a task management feature in which you can add comments to tasks.

We would appreciate if these details could be updated. As I pointed out several times below, the article reflects my professional opinion as a scientific researcher and is by no means a representation of a larger cohort of people or an organization for that matter. If nothing else, my signature under this review should be a clear testament of my intent and good faith. I openly welcome all comments, experiences, and opinions surrounding the ELNs in question and had previously updated the scores based on constructive feedback from the comments.

I think the conflict of interest is quite obvious here — and luckily, most researchers try out different softwares and are able to draw their own conclusions — which in many cases, result in a quite different ranking than the one postulated here.

Hi Young Wu, appreciate your feedback! Labii does seem like an interesting option after a quick inspection, however I would need to examine it first-hand before commenting on its functionality and usability further. For now, the information provided on the product website seems rather scarce. Nevertheless, I would happily consider reviewing Labii in a possible update to this review. I personally have contacted each ELN venders and have them demoed to me, it took me more than two months.

You will be amazed how it different to all other existing ELNs in both design and functions and how it can link the experiments, protocols, samples, reagents, et. I specifically like it to be able to extract the metadata from lab note for statistic data analysis.

Allow me to comment on the points you highlighted. I do not see a day account option as a free version but rather as a trial, which is also how it is advertised on your web page. This seems to be an honest mistake on my part, however I do recall that feature was not communicated very clearly at the time of my testing.

I would be happy to take it into account in the upcoming update of this review. However, I did focus on aspects that make an ELN user friendly to a broader range of users i.

I am not a synthetic chemist and did find myself frequently stumbling over hurdles in design that unfortunately diminished my experience with Mbook. I would like to state that Mbook did prove as a valid candidate and I definitely see it as a solid ELN.

Thank you for the article and for reviewing Mbook I am the CEO of Mestrelab, anyone reading my comment should be aware of that. Firstly, Mbook does have a free 45 day account, for those that want to try it out. Your reason to give a significant amount of weight to price is the fact that researchers like to try before they buy. This is certainly possible with Mbook. Of course, whether a 45 day or a 10 GB trial are more extensive, depends on the number of users and on the amount of data that is stored in the ELN.

Secondly, Mbook has indeed an in-house installation, as highlighted on our website. It is designed as a Cloud Solution, but we make available an installer for in-house installation to any institutions not happy putting their data on the cloud. Finally, intuitiveness of interface is a subjective matter, and therefore I cannot really comment on your evaluation there. Mbook is designed for synthetic chemistry, and it makes sense to evaluate it from that viewpoint. It is aiming at making the creation of reactions, stoichiometry tables, experimental protocols and the attachment of analytical and other data to experiments as simple as possible.

Of course, that may not work so well for other workflows or use cases, which it is not targeted to doing. From a synthetic chemist perspective, I would expect that structure editor, structure search, integrated inventory, self populating stoichiometry tables and immediate access to all analytical data are all points to value, which do not seem to be considered on your review, so this might be a point worth making.

You bring up a valid point there and I do agree with you, everybody is entitled to their own opinion and many people would have surely scored the ELNs differently, based on their own needs and experiences. In terms of interoperability, mine were not the best with LabArchives and Labfolder at the time of testing.

Please note that this article is a second revision of the original one, and it could very well be that both products experienced updates in that area since then.

However, if you scroll down you will find other people reported interoperability issues with the ELNs in question as well. You are spot on regarding sciNote, those limitations are on point and did land them a lower score. Since their mobile version actually worked great for me and still does, I only deducted one point for the lack of an API.

Multi device compatibility Working with different operating systems and browsers Cloud Real-time collaboration Instrument integration and open APIs. I personally tested LabArchives and Labfolder and both meet all the requirements, but end just with 3 out of 5. Hi Paul, thank you for your comment, this has already been discussed bellow. Posting my reply again for your convenience:. It was the last ELN I tested and it proved to best fit my needs.

Having finally found my ideal solution, I volunteered to write a piece about my journey of finding an ELN for Splice, to show my support and to help others in the same frustrating situation I was in for so long. Splice is an independent blog with contributions coming mainly from independent researchers from various institutions, such as myself. I still use sciNote every day and I firmly stand by my opinion, expressed in this article.

Just a small remark: Is a bit strange that the first place goes to the company that powered this list: Biosistemika LLC. Hi Christoph, thank you for your input! You bring up a good point, not all of the ELNs and their features in this review are equally important for everyone. Obviously expectations from lab to lab and researcher to researcher will differ and you highlighted some very good examples of that.

I needed a solid and reliable ELN solution to solve my everyday issues with experimental design and laboratory data management for a reasonable budget. I defined the scoring criteria to best represent those needs, which I believe correlate to a much larger portion of researchers out there.

However, I absolutely agree with you, if the criteria were set in a different manner, the outcome would undoubtedly differ accordingly. Hi Stelios, appreciate your feedback! Findings ELN does seem like an interesting pick after a quick inspection, however I do realize it is only available for iOS systems. I run all experiments in a PC setting and generally find solutions that are limited to a single platform disadvantaged. If a PC version comes out any time soon and an update to this review ever occurs, I would be happy to give Findings a try.

I am surprised to not see the Findings app amongst these! I have just tried sciNote and I would say that the user experience of Findings the the functionality it offers are far superior. I run a research core and we do several projects for multiple labs and we really need an ELN.

I am just testing a few, and hopefully will find time to write more about my impressions and final choice. I wanted to comment about the ratings in this review: I believe that pricing is largely over-emphasized here, a product that takes more work to create will obviously create more costs and be more expensive. User experience also seems to lean towards simple programs, it seems that more complex ELNs with more modules are rated poorly just because it took the reviewers more time to understand the different parts.

If an ELN will be used for standard operations am am willing to pay for it and spend some time to learn how to use it. SCINOTE is the first one I dis-regarded, yes their licensing is free for most and sharing is somewhat easy, but recording procedures is frankly a pain. There is no way to add tables and calculation formulas, no annotation of result files, no sketching and no repository to organize reagents that are created.

I have to agree with you there, this was a problem I faced in all the labs I have worked at so far. Many of the above included ELNs contain some form of sample inventory eg. Your account also allows you to connect with HP support faster, access a personal dashboard to manage all of your devices in one place, view warranty information, case status and more.

While we prepare for the move, we are unable to accept new postings. Or if you need technical support for your calculator visit: HP Calculators. This topic has been archived. Information and links in this thread may no longer be available or relevant. If you have a question create a new topic by clicking here and select the appropriate board. All forum topics Previous Topic Next Topic.

Level 1. Message 1 of HP Recommended. Tags 2. Tags: Archived. Accepted Solutions. Level Message 8 of One way to solve this download issue may be to run Windows System Restore as follows. Was this reply helpful? Yes No. Message 2 of Hi, You could try resetting Internet Explorer as follows - be aware that this will remove Bookmarks and Saved Passwords etc. Message 3 of Message 4 of Message 5 of Message 6 of Hi, You can download LSP fix on another computer and just transfer the file to your notebook in order to run it.

Also, try the following. Message 7 of Message 9 of To proceed, select your browser from the list below and follow the instructions. To change the name of a PDF file you want to download, right-click the download link and select Save As. However, downloading a PDF is still possible.

By default, Google Chrome opens a PDF file in the browser window instead of saving it to the downloads folder.